Positive Politeness Strategies in Health-Related Podcast Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Billie Eilish's Discussion on Tourette Syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v4i2.6434Keywords:
Positive Politeness, pragmatics, podcast discourse, health communication, Billie EilishAbstract
While previous studies have explored politeness strategies in digital communication and podcast interactions, relatively little attention has been paid to how positive politeness functions in health-related podcast discourse, particularly when discussing sensitive personal experiences. Addressing this gap, this study investigates the realization and communicative functions of positive politeness strategies in Billie Eilish's podcast interview discussing Tourette syndrome. Guided by Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory, the study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach. The data were collected from a publicly available podcast interview and analyzed through the identification and contextual interpretation of utterances reflecting positive politeness strategies. The analysis identified six dominant strategies: noticing and attending to the hearer, seeking agreement, using in-group identity markers, giving reasons, expressing optimism, and minimizing potential discomfort. These strategies were employed to foster empathy, establish interpersonal solidarity, encourage openness, reduce potential face threats, and maintain conversational comfort when addressing sensitive health-related experiences. The findings demonstrate that positive politeness serves as an important interpersonal resource in facilitating supportive and empathetic communication within digital health discourse. By illustrating how politeness strategies contribute to meaningful interaction in podcast-based health communication, this study extends pragmatic research on digital discourse and offers empirical insights into the role of positive politeness in constructing rapport and promoting audience engagement in discussions of personal health experiences.References
Bonini, T. (2020). Podcasts and public service media: Investigating the future of audio storytelling. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 18(1), 15–30.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Y., Chen, B., & Lou, J. (2024). Politeness Conversational Strategies in Business Texts: A State-of-the-art Review. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies, 43, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/43/20240572
Davis, K. (2021). Empathy and trust in health communication. Health Communication, 36(8), 945–954.
Dynel, M. (2021). Pragmatics of digital communication: Politeness and impoliteness in online interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.005
Georgakopoulou, A. (2022). Narrative and identity in digital communication. Discourse, Context & Media, 49, 100628.
Goudarzi, E., Ghonsooly, B., & Taghipour, Z. (2015). Politeness Strategies in English Business Letters: A Comparative Study of Native and Non-Native Speakers of English. Psychology of Language and Communication, 19(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2015-0004
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.
Gurjar, N. (2020). Leveraging social networks for authentic learning in distance learning teacher education. TechTrends, 64(4), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00510-7
Hafner, C. A. (2019). Digital Literacies for English Language Learners. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_46-1
Haugh, M. (2020). The social practice of politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 16(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0033
Holliday, A. (2012). Culture, communication, context and power. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 244–259). Routledge:Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805640
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2021). Delivering relevance: the emergence of ESP as a discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 64, 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.06.002
Johns, A. M. (2013). The History of English for Specific Purposes Research. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 301–321). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch16
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2023). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Khoshsima, H., Saed, A., & Hakimzadeh, A. (2016). Concept Mapping Strategy: A Strategic Alternative to the Matter of Spontaneous Speaking of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160401.11
Llinares, D., & Espinar, E. (2023). Podcasting and digital storytelling in contemporary media. New Media & Society, 25(4), 875–891.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mulyono, H., Amalia, D. R., & Suryoputro, G. (2019). Politeness strategies in teacher-student Whatsapp communication. Pasaa, 58, 295–318.
Pratiwi, V. U., & Anindyarini, A. (2021). Students’ politeness strategies to lecturers in sending messages through WhatsApp. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3), 6021–6032. http://www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/2402
Sifianou, M. (2019). Politeness and impoliteness in digital communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.001
Spinelli, M., & Dann, L. (2019). Podcasting: The audio media revolution. Bloomsbury Academic.
Street, R. L. (2022). Communication in healthcare interactions: Building trust and understanding. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(3), 451–458.
Tagg, C. (2023). Language and interaction in digital communication. Discourse, Context & Media, 54, 100701.
Taguchi, N. (2019). Second language pragmatics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.375
Yuliawati, S. N., Hazna, H., & Bakhti, K. Y. (2020). The characteristics of language politeness in students’ WhatsApp messages to lecturers. 4th International Conference on Arts Language and Culture (ICALC 2019), 421, 506–511.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angels Dermika PANJAITAN, Sri SUGIHARTI, Suswanto Ismadi MEGAH S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIAL are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
![]()
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.











