Stance Markers of Hedge and Booster to Construct Arguments in IELTS Essay Writings: A Genre Based-Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v4i1.6124Keywords:
Arguments, Genre Analysis, IELTS Essay Writings, Stance Markers of Hedge and BoosterAbstract
Although stance markers of hedge and booster have been studied in academic writings and receiving growing concerns from linguistic scholars worldwide, most of them focused on analyzing these stance markers in research purposes, such as research papers, research theses, etc. However, studies on this area within essay writings is still limited, and none has investigated these stance markers within the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) essay writings. Understanding the importance of filling this need has encouraged me to analyze stance markers of hedge and booster within the IELTS essay writings by addressing three research focuses: the roles of these two stance markers in essay writings, the distribution of hedge and booster in essay writings, and the possibilities of these two stance markers appear in the same sentence. To realize this intention, this study used a genre approach by employing 30 IELTS essays bands 7, 8, and 9 as data sets, and they were analyzed using a mix method. The results revealed that stance markers of hedge and booster are important in these data set to show authorial stances in academic essays. Then, hedge appears more dominantly in band 7, while booster has higher numbers of appearance in band 8 and 9. Last, these two stance markers are possible appearing in the same sentence when the sentence contains multiple clauses. These findings imply that genre is much influenced by discourse communities because the present findings also become evident that the employment of hedge and booster seems to have differences from earlier different academic writings.References
Alia, M., & Aliia, A. M. (2025). How AI Tools Affect Discourse Markers When Paraphrased. In Using AI Tools in Text Analysis, Simplification, Classification, and Synthesis (pp. 321-350). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9511-0.ch011
Alıa, M. M., & Jomaa, N. (2023). Authorial stance in academic writing by EFL Arab postgraduates. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 5(1), 96-131. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jell/issue/78170/1317709
Alramadan, M. M. (2020). Authorial stance in English, Arabic and EFL applied linguistics research: An appraisal study. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 14(1), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v14i1.1844
Alward, A. S. A. (2014). Hedges and boosters in the English as a foreign language undergraduate persuasive essays and job application letters Universiti Utara Malaysia].
Ananda, R. P., Arsyad, S., & Dharmayana, I. W. (2018). Argumentative Features of International English Language Testing System (IELTS) Essays: A Rhetorical Analysis on Successful Exam Essays. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4768
Anas, I., Rahayu, De Vega, N., & Samsudin. (2025). Situating English language teaching in culturally specific contexts: a narrative case study into teachers’ intercultural experiences. Language and Intercultural Communication, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2584150
Andika, R. P., Arsyad, S., & Harahap, A. (2018). Rhetorical moves and linguistic features of journal article abstracts by postgraduate students, national and international authors in applied linguistics. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 3(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v3i1.6539
Bilal, A., & Shehzad, W. (2019). Genre analysis: Studying authorial stance in the Pakistani research articles of business and management sciences. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 455-471. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p455
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in Health Promotion International. Health Promotion International, 39(3), daae049. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae049
Cheng, F.-W., & Unsworth, L. (2016). Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.001
Ekoç, A. (2020). Lexical hedging and boosting strategies in the abstracts written by undergraduate ELT students. In The changing face of ESP in today's classroom and workplace (pp. 195-214).
Escalona, S. L. (2024). Hedges and Boosters in College Essays: A Study of Linguistic Modulation in Student Writing. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 10(1), 593294. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels
Hürcan, E., & Duruk, E. (2025). Use of Hedges and Boosters by Undergraduate Turkish ELT Students. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 8(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.35207/later.1752946
Hussain, S. S., Ali, A. M., Kasim, Z. M., & Jalaluddin, I. (2020). A review on the rhetorical structure and linguistic features of corporate annual reports. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7591
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text & Talk, 18(3), 349-382. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29.
Jabeen, I., Almutairi, H. S. S., & Almutairi, H. N. H. (2023). Interaction in research discourse: A comparative study of the use of hedges and boosters in PhD theses by Australian and Saudi writers. World Journal of English Language, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n8p119
Loan, N. T. T. (2018). Rhetorical structures and linguistic features of English abstracts in Thai rajabhat university journals. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2404-06
Mubarok, T. A. (2021). An Analysis of Linguistic Features of Evaluative Stance Found in Research Articles’ Introduction. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 6(4), 933-939. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v6i4.753
Nasirizadeh, Z., & Paramasivam, S. (2024). Stance markers in forestry research articles: indicators of authoritative voice. Discourse and Interaction, 17(1), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2024-1-115
Ningrum, S., Puspita, H., & Mulyadi, A. (2024). Hedges and boosters in academic writing of ASEAN EFL learners. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 8(1), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.1.202-218
Pedida, J. A., Alzate, L. J. A., Eustaquio, M. T. L., & Lopez, R. M. C. (2025). Language of Caution and Certainty: Writing Proficiency in Hedges and Boosters in Student Essays. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(11). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100485
Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and Boosters in Academic Writing-A Study of Gender Differences in Essays Written by Swedish Advanced Learners of English Goteborgs Universitet].
Seyyedi, K. (2025). Rhetorical Analysis of Hedges and Boosters in Academic Articles Written by EFL Writers. QALAAI ZANIST SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 10(2), 1137-1145. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.10.2.41
Shen, Z. (2023). Functions of hedges and boosters in academic writing. Journal of Education Reform and Innovation, 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.61957/joerai-20230102
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Syafei, M., Triprihatmini, V., Thongmark, N., Montales, C. L. B., & Madjdi, A. H. (2025). Hedging and Boosting Sensitivity in EFL Students’ Timed-Handwriting. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(3), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n3p56
Triyoko, H., Wijana, I. D. P., & Baryadi, I. P. (2021). Hedges and boosters in Indonesian scientific articles. Register Journal, 14(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v14i1.65-82
Vázquez Orta, I., & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.14
Wang, J., & Jiang, F. (2018). Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing: Hedges, boosters and self-mentions across disciplines and writer groups. In Intercultural perspectives on research writing (pp. 195-216). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan
Warsidi. (2021). Rhetorical Patterns of Indonesian Research Articles in Law and History Disciplines: A Genre-Based Analysis [Dissertation, University of New England, Australia].
Warsidi. (2022). Genre analysis of English vs. Indonesian application letters. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(2), 419-435. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i2.857
Warsidi. (2023a). Promoting research through claiming centrality and explicit research contributions in applied linguistics research articles. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 264-280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.26491
Warsidi. (2023b). Sentence Studies in Indonesian Research Articles from the History and Law Disciplines. Jurnal Sinestesia, 13(2), 1351-1360.
Warsidi. (2023c). Syntactic Choices in Indonesian Research Articles from the Disciplines of History Education and Law: What do Authors Prefer? Didaktika, 12(4), 975-982. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.335
Warsidi. (2024a). The Rhetorical Model of English Sales Copies Posted on Instagram. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455
Warsidi. (2024b). The Rhetorical Model of Indonesian Research Article Introductions (RAIs) in the Law Discipline: Problems and Opportunities. Journal of Language and Literature, 24(2), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v24i2.6455
Warsidi. (2025). Genre Analysis in Research Articles. Publisher Azriel Alfarizqi Akkbar.
Warsidi, & Adnan, Z. (2024). The rhetorical strategies to create incremental innovation in applied linguistics research articles. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.29780
Warsidi, Adnan, Z., & Maniam, V. (2024). A Contrastive Genre-Based Study of English and Indonesian RAIs in the History Discipline. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 467-488. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270422
Warsidi, Adnan, Z., & Maniam, V. (2025). Rhetorical Problems of Indonesian Research Article Results and Discussion in the History and Law Disciplines. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 28(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v28i1.9095
Warsidi, Halim, A., Kamal, A., Halim, N. M., Adnan, Z., Samad, I. A., & Irawan, A. M. (2025). Responses to earlier literature in research article introductions: A rhetorical study in applied linguistics. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 398-411. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.35160
Warsidi, & Maniam, V. (2024). Academic Conflicts in Research Articles Discussion: The Case of Indonesian and Malaysian Authors. Issues in Language Studies, 13(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5865.2024
Yahya, A. M., & Alyousef, H. S. (2022). The construction of stance and authorial voice in medical texts written by professional scholars. Sumerianz Journal of Education, Linguistics and Literature, 5(3), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.47752/sjell.53.58.70
Zhang, G. (2023). Authorial stance in citations: Variation by writer expertise and research article part-genres. English for Specific Purposes, 70, 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.002
Богинская, О. А. (2024). Stancetaking in English-Medium Research Article Abstracts: A Contrastive Analysis. Вестник Северного (Арктического) федерального университета. Серия «Гуманитарные и социальные науки», 24(2), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V332
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WARSIDI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIALJ are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
Collaborative Works:
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.
