Developing Learner Autonomy: Moroccan University EFL Teachers’ Perceived Views and Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v3i2.5370Keywords:
EFL teachers, Decision-making, Learner autonomy, Out-of-class learning, Teachers’ beliefsAbstract
Learner autonomy, or the ability to take control of one’s learning, has been in emergence for decades, and its importance has been widely acknowledged. However, there remains obscurity as to what teachers think about this concept and whether or not they are willing to promote it. Accordingly, this paper aimed to investigate 21 university professors’ views regarding their understanding of learner autonomy and the principles underlying it. The study used a mixed-method approach to provide rigorous analysis of the professors’ responses. Data were collected through a questionnaire after which ten professors were invited for a semi-structured interview to allow for more explanations of the views analyzed, thus adhering to the explanatory sequential design. Findings demonstrated that professors showed an understanding of the basic characteristics of learner autonomy. While each of the four orientations were maintained, the most supported was the technical orientation followed by the psychological orientation, a finding that was corroborated by the qualitative analysis wherein notions such as ‘motivation’, ‘metacognitive strategies’, and ‘decisions’ recurred. It was observed that their views were far less socially driven. This study has various implications for both theory and practice, particularly for EFL teachers both in this context and in other similar contexts.References
Ahmadianzadeh, B., Seifoori, Z., & Tamjid, N. H. (2018). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about and practices of learner autonomy across experience and licensure. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2018.1501694
Al Asmari, A. (2010). Practices and prospects of learner autonomy: Teachers’ perceptions. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p1
Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller
(Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18-34). Routledge.
Benson, P. (2010). Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test?. In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 77-97). Multilingual Matters.
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19(4), 426-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
Borg, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012a). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr065
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012b). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices (ELT Research Paper 12-07). British Council. Available at https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/b459%20ELTRP%20Report%20Busaidi_final.pdf
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2017). Language learner autonomy in tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 1-30. DOI: 10.1177/1362168817725759
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chan, V. (2003): Autonomous language learning: The teachers' perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 1(8), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052311
Cotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 49(3), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.219
Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27, 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00047-0
Creswell, J., & Clark, V. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Dam, L. (2018). Learners as researchers of their own language learning: Examples from an autonomy classroom. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 9(3), 262-279. DOI.10.37237/090303
Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford university press.
Dornyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Pergamon.
Joshi, K. R. (2011). Learner perceptions and teacher beliefs about learner autonomy in language learning. Journal of NELTA, 16(2), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v16i1-2.6126
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik Language Learning Resources.
Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System 24(4), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00039-5
Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2016). An A-Z applied linguistics research methods. Palgrave.
Macaro, E. (1997). Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy: Modern languages in practice. Multilingual Matters.
Macaro, E. (2008). The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 47-62). John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Murase, F. (2015). Measuring language learner autonomy: Problems and possibilities. In J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-63). Palgrave Macmillan.
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192 - 203). Longman.
Ouakrime, M. (1988). The neglected species need some “AIR”: Focus on the learner. In A. Zaki, A. Boumoussa, M. Najbi & S. Mehdi (Eds.), ELT in Morocco: Directions for the nineties. Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference (pp. 64-68), Rabat.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 75-91). Palgrave Macmillan.
Palfreyman, D. (2003). Introduction: Culture and learner autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 1-19). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 35-53). London, New York: Routledge.
Perry, F. J. (2005). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rañosa-Madrunio, M., Tarrayo, V. N., Tupas, R., & Valdez, P . N. (2016). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices in the Philippines. In R. Bernard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 114-133). IDP Education.
Rasinger, S. M. (2010). Qualitative methods: Concepts, frameworks and issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 50-67). Continuum International Publishing Group.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Saraswati, S. (2019). EFL teachers beliefs and practices on learner autonomy. English Journal, 13(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.32832/english.v13i2.3782
Sheerin, S. (1997). An exploration of the relationship between self-access and independent learning. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 54-65). Routledge.
Sinclaire, B. (2008). Multiple voices: Negotiating pathways towards teacher and learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 237-266). John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 62(4), 395-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn038
Tapinta, P. (2016). Thai teachers’ beliefs in developing learner autonomy:
L2 education in Thai universities. In R. Bernard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 96-113). IDP Education.
Tassinari, M. G. (2012). Evaluating learner autonomy: A dynamic model with descriptors. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.37237/030103
Tassinari, M. G. (2018). Autonomy and reflection on practice in a self-access language center: Comparing the manager and the student assistant perspectives. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 9(3), 387-412.
Van Loi, N. (2016). Learner Autonomy in Vietnam: Insights from English Language Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. In R. Bernard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 1-22). IDP Education.
Wang, Y., & Ryan, J. (2020). The complexity of control shift for learner autonomy: A mixed-method case study of Chinese EFL teachers’ practice and cognition. Language Teaching Research, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957922
Wang, Y., & Wang, M. (2016). Developing Learner Autonomy: Chinese University EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices. In R. Bernard & J. Li (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 23-42). IDP Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Said OUSSOU, Abdelhak ELBOUZIANY, Hajare BOUALI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIALJ are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
![]()
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.











