Measuring Student’s Perception Towards the Implementation of Moodle-Based E-Learning Platform in ELT: A Rasch Model Measurement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v3i1.5027Keywords:
Moodle-based e-learning, ELT, RASCH, perceived usefulness, ease of use, behavioral intentionAbstract
The wide-ranging and provision of high-end technology have brought a significant impact on the world of education. Teacher and student are expected to collaborate effectively in learning process using technology. This paper reveals the investigation on student’s perception towards the implementation of Moodle-based e-learning in ELT as well as some problems encountered by the users (learners) in utilizing the platform. A mix method approach was employed using online survey and interview. Three classes consisting 62 students who have experienced a Moodle-based e-learning were engaged both in the survey and interview. The data obtained from the online survey was analyzed using a RASCH measurement analysis with IRT (Item Response Theory) approach. The result shows a positive trend on student’s perceived usefulness (PU), ease of use (EoU), behavioral intention (BoI) towards the implementation of the platform. This article also provides several suggestions for further research and development within the area of Moodle-based e-learning platform.References
Amandu, G. M., Muliira, J. K., & Fronda, D. C. (2013). Using Moodle E-learning Platform to Foster Student Self-directed Learning: Experiences with Utilization of the Software in Undergraduate Nursing Courses in a Middle Eastern University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.260
Barge, J. D. (2012). Student learning objectives as Measures of educator effectiveness: the basics for classroom teachers (pp. 1–16). State School Superintendent.
Barge, P., & Londhe, B. R. (2014). From Teaching, Learning to Assessment: MOODLE Experience at B’School in India. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11(14), 857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00249-4
Baytiyeh, H. (2013). Users’ Acceptance and Use of Moodle:The Community Influence. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 9(4), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2013100103
Boehning, S. J. (2008). The experience of eighth grade Language Arts students using Moodle in a Language Arts classroom. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 69(February), 170. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc6&NEWS=N&AN=2008-99130-168
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model. In International Journal of Testing (Vol. 1, Issue 3). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT013&4_10
Bradley, L. (2013). Language Learning and Technology: student activities in web-based environments [University of Gothenburg]. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32322
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixed Methods Research: A Discussion Paper. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1658/1100-9233(2004)015[0085:SAAMIP]2.0.CO;2
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bremer, D., & Bryant, R. (2005). A Comparison of two learning management Systems: Moodle vs Blackboard. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, 135–140. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:A+Comparison+of+two+learning+management+Systems:+Moodle+vs+Blackboard#0
Chapelle, C. a. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (B. Harley & J. H. Hulstijn (eds.); Volume 7). John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Chou, T.-C. R. (2014). A Scale of University Students’ Attitudes toward e-Learning on the Moodle System. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 4(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijopcd.2014070104
Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed method research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical Models for E-Learning : A Theory-Based Design Framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9200-1
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. In Computer Assisted Language Learning (Vol. 10, pp. 320–324). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn045
Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2014). Digital literacies: Research and resources in language teaching. Routledge.
Egbert, J., Elhussein, I., ElTurki, E., & Muthukrishan, R. (2012). Applying principles for new literacies in differing CALL contexts : Conceptualizing issues for teaching , research , and policy. Call-Ej, 13(2), 1–11.
Elias, T. (2010). Universal instructional design principles for Moodle. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/D7717109-CDE1-45E2-ADA3-C41E77B5A9D3
Evans, M. J. (2009). Foreign language learning with digital technology. Continuum International Publishing Group. http://books.google.com/books?id=c_WbnOJlHHsC&pgis=1
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in action: a descriptive study of secondary teachers’ currciulum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229.
Hemphill, L. S., & McCaw, D. S. (2009). Moodling Professional Development Training that Worked. In Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level (pp. 808–822). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-120-9.ch050
Holton, D. L. (2010). Using Moodle to Teach Constructivist Learning Design Skills to Adult Learners. In T. Kidd & J. Keengwe (Eds.), Adult Learning in the Digital Age:Perspectives on Online Technologies and Outcomes (pp. 40–51). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-828-4.ch005
Hsu, H. (2012). The Acceptance of Moodle : An Empirical Study Based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3, 44–46. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38b010
Jarvis, H. (2005). Technology and change in English language teaching (ELT). Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 213–227. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/December_05_hj.php
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education : what is ‘ enhanced ’ and how do we know ? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Lind, S., & Jennewine, L. (2009). Technology and english language teaching in brazil. Language, 25, 235–254.
Mahdi, H. R. (2014). Investigating Students’ Acceptance and Self-Efficacy of E-Learning at Al-Aqsa University Based On TAM Model. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 9(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2014070103
Mahmud, Z., & Porter, A. (2015). Using rasch analysis to explore what students learn about probability concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1937.1-10
Mcnamara, T., & Knoch, U. (2012). The Rasch wars: The emergence of Rasch measurement in language testing. Language Testing, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211430367
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/99246/.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 1–16). https://www.punyamishra.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TPACK-Handout.pdf
Musdariah, A., Basri, M., & Jabu, B. (2021). The impact of hybrid learning in teaching English for business communication in vocational higher education of Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 4(3), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i3.124
Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
Pektaş, Ş. T., & Demirkan, H. (2011). Experiences with moodle as a communication tool for design teamwork: A users’ perspective. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 28(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2011.2.12
Pieri, M. (2014). An E-Learning Web 2.0 Experience at the University. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2014010101
Rahim, A., Hadi, S., Marlina, M., Susilowati, D., Muti’ah, M., & Irhas, I. (2024). Transformation of the Computerized Mathematics Final Exam: How was the Results of Computerized Adaptive Test-Based Assessment? Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 15(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v15i2.69485
Sanchez-Santamaria, J., Javier Ramos, F., & Sanchez-Antolin, P. (2012). The student’s perspective: teaching usages of moodle at university. 5th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2012), 2968–2973.
Siirak, V. (2011). Some Experiences of E-Learning in the Moodle E-Learning Environment. In D. Haftor & A. Mirijamdotter (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies, Society and Human Beings: Theory and Framework (Festschrift in honor of Gunilla Bradley) (pp. 307–312). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-057-0
Sontheimer, C. W. (2011). Using moodle for language teaching: a guide to moodle activities for the language classroom. Lifelong Learning Program.
Stanford, J. (2009). Listening Activities. In Moodle 1.9 for second language teaching (Issue Chapter 8). PACK publishing.
Stozhko, N., Bortnik, B., Mironova, L., Tchernysheva, A., & Poddhivalova, E. (2015). Interdisciplinary project-based learning : technology for improving student cognition. Research in Learning Technology, 23(27577), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.27577
TTCC. (1998). Teacher Technology Competencies. In Teacher Technology Competency Committee (p. 18). http://www.edb.utexas.edu/education/assets/files/ltc/about/TTCompetencies.pdf
Wu, W. (2008). The application of Moodle on an EFL collegiate writing environment. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature, 5(7), 45–56.
Young, C. A., & Bush, J. (2004). Teaching the english language arts with technology: a critical approach and pedagogical framework. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(1), 1–22.
Yusuf, I., Widyaningsih, S. W., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Istiyono, E. (2020). Development of Moodle Learning Management System-Based E-Learning Media in Physics Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 439, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200515.042
Yusuf, M. O., & Balogun, M. R. (2011). Student-Teachers ’ Competence and Attitude towards Information and Communication Technology : A Case Study in a Nigerian University. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(1), 18–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reski PILU, Suhrah SUHRAH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIALJ are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
![]()
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.











