Revitalizing Writing Education: Uniting Self-Determination Theory and Project-Based Learning for Enhanced Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v4i1.5850Keywords:
Self-Determination Theory (SDT), Project-Based Learning (PjBL), Writing, Student EngagementAbstract
Traditional L2 writing education frequently struggles to motivate students, resulting in diminished engagement and suboptimal learning outcomes. To address this, the current study investigates the revitalization of writing instruction by integrating Project-Based Learning (PjBL) with the motivational framework of Self-Determination Theory (SDT). The research specifically aims to uncover the psychological mechanisms—autonomy, competence, and relatedness—that underpin student success in collaborative writing environments. Adopting a qualitative case study design, data were gathered from 10 EFL undergraduate students through semi-structured interviews, reflective journals, and classroom observations, which were then analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings reveal that while PjBL robustly supports competence and autonomy through authentic tasks, the need for relatedness is often threatened by social loafing and inequitable participation. Significantly, the study identifies a "monitoring paradox," where students perceived educator oversight as an essential protective mechanism for relatedness and group fairness, rather than a hindrance to their autonomy. These insights contribute to Applied Linguistics by redefining structured teacher intervention as a vital pedagogical affordance that safeguards the socio-motivational integrity of the language learning process, offering practical strategies for more inclusive L2 writing instruction.References
Araujo Dawson, B., Kilgore, W., & Rawcliffe, R. M. (2022). Strategies for creating inclusive learning environments through a social justice lens. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12, 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2022.12.0.02
Au, W. (2022). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003005179
Bakar, S. (2021). Investigating the dynamics of contemporary pedagogical approaches in higher education through innovations, challenges, and paradigm shifts. Social Science Chronicle, 1(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2021.009
Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1518602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be (com) ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
Brinkmann, S. (2022). Qualitative interviewing: Conversational knowledge through research interviews. Oxford University Press.
Brosy, J., Bangerter, A., & Ribeiro, S. (2020). Encouraging the production of narrative responses to past-behaviour interview questions: effects of probing and information. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1704265
Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Fourth Edition). In Sage Publication Inc.
De Vega, N., & Rahayu. (2023). Enhancing English Learning: Self-Determination in Indonesia Digital Classrooms. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 6(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v6i2.6611
Deci & Ryan. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2
Deredzai, M., & Goronga, P. (2025). Promoting Trust and Psychological Safety in Team Environments: Insights for Universities. In Developing Effective and High-Performing Teams in Higher Education (pp. 29–56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3852-0.ch002
Dörnyei, Z., & Muir, C. (2019). Creating a Motivating Classroom Environment (pp. 719–736). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_36
Guay, F. (2022). Applying Self-Determination Theory to Education: Regulations Types, Psychological Needs, and Autonomy Supporting Behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355
Hajiyeva, B. (2024). Language Anxiety in ESL Learners: Causes, Effects, and Mitigation Strategies. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69760/pn9wgv05
Han, S., Liu, D., & Lv, Y. (2022). The influence of psychological safety on students’ creativity in project-based learning: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865123
Hussein, B. (2021). Addressing collaboration challenges in project-based learning: The student’s perspective. Education Sciences, 11(8), 434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080434
Iida, A., & Chamcharatsri, B. (2022). Emotions in second language poetry writing: a poetic inquiry into Japanese EFL students’ language learning experiences. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1856114
Johnson, C. E., Keating, J. L., & Molloy, E. K. (2020). Psychological safety in feedback: what does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it? Medical Education, 54(6), 559–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14154
Johnston, O., Wildy, H., & Shand, J. (2023). Student voices that resonate–Constructing composite narratives that represent students’ classroom experiences. Qualitative Research, 23(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13705
Kyrpa, A. (2023). Lowering the affective filter: strategies for teaching in challenging environments during war-time. Pedagogy of the Formation of a Creative Person in Higher and Secondary Schools, 88, 47–51. https://doi.org/DOI https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2023.88.8
Land, C. L. (2022). Recentering purpose and audience as part of a critical, humanizing approach to writing instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.371
Liudmyla Hutsalo, Iryna Skliar, Andrii Abrosimov, Nataliia Kharchenko, O. O. (2024). Strategies for developing critical thinking and problem-based learning in the modern educational environment. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0209
Makkonen, T., Tirri, K., & Lavonen, J. (2021). Engagement in learning physics through project-based learning: A case study of gifted Finnish upper-secondary-level students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211018644
Maqbool, R., & Shaji, A. (2024). Quantifying the social loafing led productivity issues in architecture, engineering and construction project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2023-0741
Maska, L. (2025). Academic Motivation, Perceived Employability, Academic Outcomes, and Well-Being in Greek Higher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6813096/v1
Moustafa, A., & Al-Rashaida, M. (2024). Fostering students’ critical thinking through the implementation of project-based learning. In Cutting-Edge Innovations in Teaching, Leadership, Technology, and Assessment (pp. 42–53). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Ojong, A. S. (2023). Unraveling the Efficacy of Differentiated Instruction in Enhancing Second Language Acquisition: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(6), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.6.8
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Impact-driven qualitative research and evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(2), 183–200.
Preus, B. (2012). Authentic instruction for 21st century learning: Higher order thinking in an inclusive school. American Secondary Education, 59–79.
Quigley, E., O’Hanlon, M., Brandes, M., Kennedy, R., & Gavin, B. (2024). Neurodiversity and third-level education: A lacuna between the strength-based paradigm shift and the lived experience. Neurodiversity, 2, 27546330241277428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330241277427
Rahayu, R., Nur, S., Mardiani, M., & Nur, M. S. (2022). Self-determination theory in teaching practice for higher education level. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka) : Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i1.7978
Rahayu, Weda, S., Muliati, & De Vega, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in writing instruction: A self-determination theory perspective. XLinguae, 17(1), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.16
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., Kareem, A., & Mobeen, S. (2023). Amplifying Classroom Enjoyment and Cultivating Positive Learning Attitudes among ESL Learners. 11(02), 2298–2308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.1102.0522
Robinson, H., & Held, F. (2025). Psychological safety in online interdisciplinary student teams: What teachers can do to promote an effective climate for knowledge sharing, collaboration and problem-solving. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 445–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241275346
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(xxxx), 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2015). The Significance of Autonomy and Autonomy Support in Psychological Development and Psychopathology. In Developmental Psychopathology (pp. 795–849). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939383.ch20
S Surya, NK Wajdi, N Sulistiyani, R Rusmayadi, H Herman, R. Rahayu. (2024). Meningkatkan Motivasi: Tantangan dari Teori Determinasi Diri dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Menulis. Edu Sociata: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v7i1.2204
Sánchez-García, R., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2025). Enhancing Project-Based Learning: A Framework for Optimizing Structural Design and Implementation—A Systematic Review with a Sustainable Focus. Sustainability (2071-1050), 17(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114978
Tang, K.-S., McLure, F., Williams, J., & Donnelly, C. (2024). Investigating the role of self-selected STEM projects in fostering student autonomy and self-directed learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(5), 2355–2379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00696-2
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7).
Xiao, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2025). The sequential analysis of interaction in online collaborative learning: the interplay between social regulation patterns and social loafing: The sequential analysis of interaction in online collaborative learning: the interplay between social regulation . European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(4), 107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-01010-z
Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11.
Yu, S., Liu, C., & Zhang, L. (2023). Understanding L2 writers’ lived experiences of informal writing: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 100979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100979
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 RAHAYU, Sukardi WEDA, Rina Asrini BAKRI, FITRIANI, Anugerah Febrian SYAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIAL are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
Collaborative Works:
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.
