A Quad-Helix Collaboration in Anticipating the Future-Oriented Skills for Business English Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31963/rial.v3i1.5272Keywords:
Quad-helix, future-oriented skills, business English, framework, collaborationAbstract
This review paper explores the role of quad-helix collaboration—comprising government, industry, academia, and media practitioners—in anticipating the future-oriented skills required by business English professionals. As the global business landscape continues to evolve, the demand for new skills in communication, digital literacy, cross-cultural competence, and data-driven decision-making is increasing. This paper examines how each sector within the quad-helix model contributes to identifying and fostering these skills. Government bodies provide policy frameworks and funding for skill development, while industries highlight the practical needs of the workforce. Academia is instrumental in research and curriculum design, and media practitioners reflect societal demands and trends that influence professional competencies. By synthesizing insights from these four sectors, the paper identifies emerging trends in Business English education and professional practice. The review emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to skill development, proposing that a well-integrated quad-helix framework can effectively prepare business English professionals for future challenges. Additionally, it discusses the implications for curriculum design, professional development, and collaborative educational models, providing recommendations for stakeholders to bridge the gap between current training and future requirements. The paper concludes by suggesting future research directions to further explore the intersection of business English, skill development, and intersectoral collaboration.References
Amni, Z. R., & Diyah, N. (2018). Triple Helix in the Poverty Reduction Policy Based on Community Empowerment in Semarang City. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187310005
Bakos, J. D. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1997)123:1(14)
Bhatia, V. K., & Bremner, S. (2012). English for business communication. Language Teaching, 45(4), 410–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000171
Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. In Indian Journal of Medical Research (1st ed., Vol. 128, Issue 6). Open University Press.
Brown, J. (2018). Interviews, focus groups, and Delphi techniques. In P. Brough (Ed.), Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology. Routledge.
Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 7(2–3), 189–226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003
Chen, X., & Tang, M. (2024). Constructing Virtual Teaching and Research Centers for Business English Education : A Framework for Application ‐ Oriented Universities. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 11(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54097/v9dj3k61
Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2013). Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry (2nd ed.). Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
Chyzhykova, O. V. (2021). Development of Professional Communicative Competence of Future Lawyers in the Process of Teaching English. Issues in Theory and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, 12(2), 121–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog2021.02.121
Crane, P. (2011). Participatory action research workbook. Queensland University of Technology.
Dahmiri, D., Khalik, I., & Ramadhan, R. A. (2023). Development strategies for creative small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A Quintuple Helix Model approach to support smart city initiatives. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v11i3.28399
Dhivya, D. S., Hariharasudan, A., & Nawaz, N. (2023). Unleashing potential: Multimedia learning and Education 4.0 in learning Professional English Communication. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2248751. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2248751
Ding, F., & Chen, L. (2023). Optimization Design of Business English Teaching Course for International Business Majors. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 6(18), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.061806
Dzevytska, L., & Romanenko, O. (2018). New approaches to teaching business English to future economists. Periodyk Naukowy Akademii Polonijnej, 26(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/2610
Fanning, E. (2005). Formatting a paper-based survey questionnaire: Best practices. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–14. http://parkdatabase.org/files/documents/2005_Formatting-a-paper-based-Survey-Questionnaire_E-Fanning.pdf
Gattringer, R., & Wiener, M. (2020). Key factors in the start-up phase of collaborative foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119931
Hailu, A. T. (2024). The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: implementation of triple helix model relations. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(25), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00370-y
Hammersley, M. (2018). What is ethnography? Can it survive? Should it? Ethnography and Education, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1298458
Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing Case Study Research: a Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. In Dalton Transactions (Vol. 47, Issue 27). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8dt02254b
Heckadon, P., & Tuzlukova, V. (2020). Skill-based ESP Classroom: Teaching for Preserving and Enhancing Oman’s Comparative Advantages in an Era of Economic and Digital Transformation. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020, 36–48. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/MEC2.3
Hennink, M. M. (2014). Focus Group Discussions: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press.
Hongyu, L. (2023). Analysis of the Reform Path of Business English Teaching Based on Cross—Cultural Communication. Adult and Higher Education, 5(2), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.23977/aduhe.2023.050215
Kent, R. (2021). Data Construction and Data Analysis for Survey Research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kholis, A., & Iryanti, H. D. (2021). Integrating digital tools into ESP teaching: A need analysis of a business English course. LingTera, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v8i2.44059
Landoni, M., & Muradzada, N. (2024). No Interaction, No Problem? An Investigation of Organizational Issues in the University–Industry–Government Triad in a Transition Economy. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100246
Lăzărescu, A. (2013). Utopian Business English Course Delivery: Avoiding Dystopia in Class. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 446–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.143
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2024). Key Insights, Recommendations and Future Directions for Future-Oriented Learning and Skills Development for Sustainable Employability. In Future-oriented Learning and Skills Development for Employability (pp. 299–309). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8584-1_19
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1622017
McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. SAGE Publications. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Naisola-ruiter, V. (2022). The Delphi technique: a tutorial. Research in Hospitality Management, 12(1), 91–97.
Omer, N. I. M. S. (2024). Maintaining Meaningful Human Interaction in AI-Enhanced Language Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 6(3), 533–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v6i3.2083
Parker Webster, J., & Marques da Silva, S. (2013). Doing educational ethnography in an online world: methodological challenges, choices and innovations. Ethnography and Education, 8(February 2015), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.792508
Pei, L. (2021). Research on Advanced Business English Courses in the Computer Age under the Guidance of Market Demand. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1744, 032159. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032159
Pratama, B. (2018). Indonesian legal framework to support innovation sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126, 012072. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012072
Shepel, M. (2020). Development of the Future Managers’ Deontological Culture in the Process of Teaching a Foreign Language. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 2(2), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2020.2.7
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Susyanti, J., & Aminah, S. (2019). Accompaniment Model of Integrative Creative Economic for Tax Compliance. Economics and Business Solutions Journal, 3(2), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.26623/ebsj.v3i2.1582
Timalsina, R. (2021). BBS Second Year English Course in TU for the Development of Business Communication Skills. Journal of Management, 4(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3126/jom.v4i1.38682
Tong, M., & Gao, T. (2022). For Sustainable Career Development: Framework and Assessment of the Employability of Business English Graduates. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 847247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847247
Tozzi, A. (2021). The role of a “Civic University” in the frame of Quadruple Helix approach to development The paradigm of MED-QUAD project. Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.21622/RESD.2021.07.1.001
Trilestari, E. W., Wiryantiningsih, E., Jamharoh, S., & Almamalik, L. (2021). Quadrohelix Model in the Implementation of Labor Training on the Work Training Center of DKI Jakarta. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), 564, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.017
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Sixth Edit, Vol. 53, Issue 5). SAGE.
Zela, E. (2018). Investigating Student’s Needs for English Language as Foundations for Syllabus Design. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(s2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2018-0028
Zhang, G. (2018). Implication of Constructivism on Business English Textbook and Suggestions. 8th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Management Society (EMIM 2018) Implication, 250, 259–263. https://doi.org/10.2991/emim-18.2018.52
Zhang, L. (2022). Improved Collaborative Filtering Automatic Assessment System for Teaching English Writing in College. Advances in Multimedia, 7092811. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7092811
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ismail ANAS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing
All articles published in RIAL are licensed under a Creative Commons License, specifically the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows others to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. It also allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ for detail information.
Author Rights
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. This ensures their right to share, reuse, and archive their work freely while acknowledging the journal as the original place of publication.
Collaborative Works:
For collaborative works, authors should ensure that they have secured the necessary permissions from co-authors to submit the manuscript and grant the rights outlined in this policy.
Archiving and Access:
RIAL upholds an open access policy, ensuring that articles are freely accessible to a global audience upon publication. Authors' work will be archived electronically, facilitating its long-term availability and visibility.
