Papaya Fruit Quality Classification Based on Lab Color and Texture Features Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)

Authors

  • Dyah Darma Andayani Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Andi Noer Aksha Rafii
  • Kaerurrijal Mahdar
  • Winda Andrayani Ahmad
  • Mustamin Mustamin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31963/intek.v9i2.4246

Keywords:

Neural Network, LAB, Quality, Papaya, Texture

Abstract

The process of sorting the quality of papaya fruit is a postharvest problem. So far, humans still do the quality sorting process conventionally or manually. It certainly has weaknesses and limitations, which require a large workforce, and the level of human perception of the quality of papaya varies. Several studies have been carried out regarding the classification of papaya fruit quality, but these studies have accuracy that can still be improved. Therefore, in this study, it is proposed to determine the quality of papaya fruit based on LAB colour and texture features using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm. This research consists of six stages: image acquisition, pre-processing, segmentation, morphology, feature extraction and classification. The classification process for the training stage produces the highest level of accuracy in three training scenarios; namely, two techniques have 100% accuracy and 99.58% in the third scenario. Based on the best training scenario selected, the testing process produces 98.88%, the highest accuracy rate with a misclassification error of 1.12% and 69 seconds of computing time. These results indicate that the proposed method can accurately classify papaya quality based on LAB colour and texture features.

References

N. J. H. Smith, J. T. Williams, D. L. Plucknett, and J. P. Talbot, Tropical forests and their crops. Cornell University Press, 2018.

H. Kaur, B. K. Sawhney, and S. K. Jawandha, “Evaluation of plum fruit maturity by image processing techniques,†J Food Sci Technol, vol. 55, pp. 3008–3015, 2018.

I. Salinas, J. J. Hueso, and J. Cuevas, “Active control of greenhouse climate enhances papaya growth and yield at an affordable cost,†Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 378, 2021.

N. R. NMM, C. Suntharalingam, and M. F. Othman, “Competitiveness of Malaysia’s fruits in the global market: Revealed comparative advantage analysis,†Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 143–157, 2017.

S. Sadya, “Produksi Pepaya di Indonesia Capai 1,17 Juta Ton pada 2021,†2022. https://dataindonesia.id/sektor-riil/detail/produksi-pepaya-di-indonesia-capai-117-juta-ton-pada-2021 (accessed Dec. 03, 2022).

K. K. Patel, Studies on Destructive and Non-Destructive Quality Evaluations of Mango Fruit. Notion Press, 2020.

J. Naranjo-Torres, M. Mora, R. Hernández-García, R. J. Barrientos, C. Fredes, and A. Valenzuela, “A review of convolutional neural network applied to fruit image processing,†Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 3443, 2020.

M. E. Al Rivan and J. Suherman, “Penentuan Mutu Buah Pepaya California (Carica Papaya L.) Menggunakan Fuzzy Mamdani,†ELKHA: Jurnal Teknik Elektro, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 76–83, 2020.

W. D. Cahyono and D. Wirawan, “KAJIAN SIFAT FISIK BUAH PEPAYA (Carica papaya L.) MENGGUNAKAN PENGOLAHAN CITRAâ€.

F. Wibowo, D. K. Hakim, and S. Sugiyanto, “Pendugaan Kelas Mutu Buah Pepaya Berdasarkan Ciri Tekstur Glcm Menggunakan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbors,†Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika: JANAPATI, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 100–106, 2018.

A. Firlansyah, A. B. Kaswar, and A. A. N. Risal, “Klasifikasi Tingkat Kematangan Buah Pepaya Berdasarkan Fitur Warna Menggunakan JST,†Techno Xplore: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 55–60, 2021.

S. S. Chouhan, A. Kaul, and U. P. Singh, “Image segmentation using computational intelligence techniques,†Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 26, pp. 533–596, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-08

Issue

Section

ARTICLES