PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The Journal of Applied Electrical and Energy System (JPES) applies a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of all published manuscripts.

Review Model

JPES applies a double-blind peer-review process, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.

Review Procedure

1. Initial Editorial Screening: Submitted manuscripts are examined by the editorial team to assess their relevance to the journal's scope, completeness, and compliance with submission guidelines.

2. Reviewer Assignment: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to qualified reviewers with expertise relevant to the subject matter.

3. Peer Review: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript's originality, methodology, scientific validity, results, discussion, and contribution to the field.

4. Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers' comments, the editor makes a decision to accept, request revisions, or reject the manuscript.

5. Revision and Final Evaluation: Revised manuscripts may undergo further evaluation before a final editorial decision is made.

Review Criteria

Reviewers are expected to assess:

• Originality and scientific contribution.

• Relevance to the journal's focus and scope.

• Research methodology and technical accuracy.

• Quality of results and discussion.

• Appropriate use of references.

• Clarity, organization, and academic writing.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not disclose manuscript content or use unpublished information for personal advantage.

Review Ethics

JPES expects reviewers to provide objective, constructive, timely, and unbiased assessments in accordance with accepted publication ethics.