Safety Risk Analysis of Public Electric Vehicle Charging Station (SPKLU) Infrastructure in DKI Jakarta : A Comparative Study of Standard Requirements versus Actual Field Conditions

Authors

  • Rozi Adi Putra Institut Teknologi PLN
  • Ignatius Rendroyoko Institut Teknologi PLN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31963/elekterika.v23i1.6540

Keywords:

Charging station; Electrical safety; Electric vehicle; Fire safety; Gap analysis; HIRARC; Safety compliance

Abstract

The expansion of public electric vehicle charging stations (SPKLU) requires field-based safety evaluation because regulatory compliance does not guarantee uniform implementation. This study assesses safety compliance and risk priorities at 20 PLN-associated SPKLU units in DKI Jakarta. Compliance scoring, gap analysis, Pareto analysis, Spearman correlation, and HIRARC were integrated.  Mean compliance was 64.48%. Electrical safety had the highest compliance at 83.33%, followed by location and accessibility at 70.33%, user health at 68.00%, and fire safety at 36.25%. Fire safety therefore had the largest gap, 63.75%. The three dominant fire-safety deficiencies each occurred at 20 locations and contributed 39.2% of non-compliance. HIRARC identified 25 risks: 10 extreme, 4 high, 8 medium, and 3 low. HIRARC identified 14 high-to-extreme risks, demonstrating that relatively high aggregate compliance can coexist with low-frequency but high-consequence safety deficiencies. The findings support risk-prioritized improvement of fire protection, emergency preparedness, and engineering controls at SPKLU.          

References

[1] B. Wang, P. Dehghanian, S. Wang, and M. Mitolo, “Electrical safety considerations in large-scale electric vehicle charging stations,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 6603–6612, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2019.2936474.

[2] T. Kivelä, M. Abdelawwad, M. Sperling, M. Drabesch, M. Schwarz, J. Börcsök, and K. Furmans, “Functional safety and electric vehicle charging: Requirements analysis and design for a safe charging infrastructure system,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems, 2021, pp. 317–324, doi: 10.5220/0010398303170324.

[3] T. Feng, Z. Zhang, L. Xiong, J. Zhang, N. Li, S. Jin, and L. Li, “Exploring the whole-process fire safety system for charging stations,” in Proc. 2025 5th Int. Conf. Business Administration and Data Science, 2025, pp. 211–221, doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-980-3_2049.

[4] S. Dong and M. Lu, “Assessment of electromagnetic exposure levels for humans from electric vehicle DC charging stations,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 18, p. 5735, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25185735.

[5] UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, “UCLA team finds high levels of particulates in air near electric vehicle fast charging stations,” UCLA Newsroom, Jul. 3, 2025.

[6] Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Penyediaan Infrastruktur Pengisian Listrik untuk Kendaraan Bermotor Listrik Berbasis Baterai, 2023.

[7] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61851-1:2017, Electric Vehicle Conductive Charging System, Part 1: General Requirements, 2017.

[8] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62196-1:2022, Plugs, Socket-Outlets, Vehicle Connectors and Vehicle Inlets: Conductive Charging of Electric Vehicles, Part 1: General Requirements, 2022.

[9] Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Peraturan Gubernur Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 31 Tahun 2022 tentang Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Wilayah Perencanaan Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, 2022.

[10] I. P. Dharmawan, I. N. S. Kumara, and I. N. Budiastra, “Perkembangan infrastruktur pengisian baterai kendaraan listrik di Indonesia,” Jurnal SPEKTRUM, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 90–101, 2021, doi: 10.24843/spektrum.2021.v08.i03.p12.

[11] K. G. H. Mangunkusumo, Sriyono, A. S. Surya, P. A. A. Pramana, and J. Hartono, “Evaluation of the safety aspects of using electric vehicle home charging devices in Indonesia,” in Proc. 2022 Int. Conf. Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power, 2022, pp. 111–116, doi: 10.1109/ICT-PEP57242.2022.9988841.

[12] A. F. Herzasha, “Risk assessment of public electric vehicle battery swapping station (SPBKLU),” Journal of Economics and Business UBS, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 903–918, 2023, doi: 10.52644/joeb.v12i2.193.

[13] L. Sun, Y. Ma, X. Li, D. Guo, J. Liu, P. Wu, and P. Xiao, “Research on integrated safety assessment model of electric vehicle charging process,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2023, doi: 10.1049/stg2.12071.

[14] V. Linja-Aho, “Electric vehicle charging safety: The state of art, best practices, and regulatory aspects,” in 2024 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop, 2024, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1109/ESW52258.2024.10752779.

[15] A. T. Mulyono, B. Kushari, and H. E. Gunawan, “Audit keselamatan infrastruktur jalan: Studi kasus Jalan Nasional KM 78–KM 79 Jalur Pantura Jawa, Kabupaten Batang,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 163–174, 2009, doi: 10.5614/jts.2009.16.3.5.

[16] Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand, AS/NZS 4360:2004, Risk Management, 2004.

[17] A. Puspita, D. Finanta, C. R. I. Sinulingga, and Arsyadona, “Analisis penerapan manajemen risiko terhadap kecelakaan kerja di sektor manufaktur,” Jurnal Sains Student Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 258–263, 2025, doi: 10.61722/jssr.v3i1.3472.

[18] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, “Hierarchy of controls,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024.

[19] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 31000:2018, Risk Management: Guidelines, 2018.

[20] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 45001:2018, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems: Requirements with Guidance for Use, 2018.

[21] E. Beşiktaşli and A. Yurtcu, “Evaluation of electric vehicles and charging stations in terms of occupational health and safety,” Amesia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.54559/amesia.1729996.

[22] T. Dahniar and F. Dwi Ibnu, “Penerapan metode HIRARC untuk pengelolaan risiko kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja di industri besi,” Industri Inovatif: Jurnal Teknik Industri, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2025, doi: 10.36040/industri.v15i1.12123.

[23] R. Q. Akbar and M. Yusuf, “Analisis kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3) dengan metode HIRARC pada pembangunan gedung bertingkat di Banyuwangi,” Jurnal Terapan Teknik Industri dan Infrastruktur, vol. 1, no. 1, 2025.

[24] A. R. Widya and S. Kusuma, “Analisis pengendalian risiko K3 dalam proses produksi pembuatan stator dengan metode Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Control (HIRARC) di perusahaan pembuat komponen otomotif,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Waluyo Jatmiko, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 69–81, 2025, doi: 10.33005/wj.v17i1.11.

[25] S. Ramli, Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja OHSAS 18001. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles