Peer Review Process

Teknologi Elekterika applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and objectivity of every manuscript submitted to the journal.

1. Submission and Initial Screening

• Each submitted manuscript is checked by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal's scope, formatting requirements, and ethical standards.

• Manuscripts that do not meet the basic criteria will be returned to the author for revision or rejection at this stage.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

• Eligible manuscripts are sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the field.

• Both the author and the reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process.

• Reviewers assess the manuscript based on originality, technical quality, relevance, clarity, and contribution to the field of electrical, electronics, and applied engineering technology.

3. Review Outcomes

Each reviewer may recommend one of the following:

• Accept without revision

• Accept with minor revisions

• Major revision required

• Reject

4. Author Revisions

• If revisions are requested, the authors are given time to revise the manuscript and submit a response to the reviewers' comments.

• Revised manuscripts may be sent back to the original reviewers for re-evaluation.

5. Editorial Decision

• Based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the quality of the revisions, the Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision.

• Authors will be notified of the decision, along with constructive feedback.

6. Final Editing and Publication

• Accepted manuscripts go through a final editing process for formatting, grammar, and layout.

• The final version is published online under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license, ensuring open and perpetual access.

---

⏱ Review Timeline

The average review and decision process takes 4–8 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and the complexity of revisions.