PENGARUH KEADILAN PERSEPSIAN, KOMITMEN, JOB RELEVANT INFORMATION DAN KEPUASAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA MANAJEMENR DALAM PENGANGARAN PARTISIPATIF
Abstract
This study aims at social factors in the form of perceptual justice, motivational in the form of commitment, cognitive inthe form of Job Relevant Information and job satisfaction influence the performance of managers in participativebudgeting so that later research is used to test the integrative model in budget participation on managerial performance.This study was conducted with a sample of both managers of service companies and manufacturing companies in thecity of Makassar Research procedures that have been done is data retrieval and the process of descriptive data and hasnot done though the data. The data show that the questionnaire used has met the valid and reliable data quality. Theresults of regression analysis of this study indicate that budget participation affects commitment to objectives anddistributive justice. Budgetary participation is also able to positively and significantly affect Job Relevant Information(JRI). In addition, budget participation is also able to significantly influence job satisfaction and work commitment.References
Ali, Kuncoro, C., 2007, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Pengembangan Karir PNS terhadap Kepuasan
Kerja Aparatur di DIY, Tesis, UGM
Bartol, Kathryn M., Durham, Cathy C., Poon, June M.L., 2001, “Influence of Performance Rating
Segmentation on Motivation and Fairness Perceptionsâ€, Journal of Applied Psychologies, 86, hal.
-1119
Brown, Clifton E., dan Solomon, Ira, 1987, “Effects of Outcome Information on Evaluations of Managerial
Decisions, The Accounting review, 564-577
Brownell and McInnes 1986. Budgetary Participation, Motivation and Managerial Performance, The
Accounting Review, Vol. LXI no.4, pp 587-600
Brownell, P 1982, A field Study Examination of Budgetary Participation and Locus of Control, The
Accounting Review, Vol LVII No.4, Oct, pp 844-860
Brownell, P. 1981. Participation in Budgeting, Locus of Control and Organization Efectiveness, The
Accounting Review, Vol LVI No.4 , Oct , pp 844-860
Brownell, Peter, 1981, “Participation in Budgeting, Locus of Control and Organizational Effectivenessâ€, The
Accounting Review, 844-770
Faturochman, 2002, “ Keadilan Perspektif Psikologiâ€, Unit Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi dan Pustaka
Pelajar, Yogyakarta
Folger, Robert dan Skarlicki, Daniel P., 1999, “Unfairness and Resistance to Change: Hardship as
Mistreatmentâ€, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12 (1), hal. 35-50
Frucot V and Shearon W.T, 1991. Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial
performance and job satisfaction, The Accounting Review, Januari pp.80-89
Gilliland, Stephen W., 1993, “The Perceived Fairness of Selection System: An Organizational Perspectiveâ€,
(4), hal. 694-634
Gordon and Narayan., 1984. Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Enviromental Uncertainty and
Organization Structure: An Empirical Investigation, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 9
No.4, pp 33-37
Govindarajan,V,. 1986. Impact of Participation in Budgetary Process on Attitudes and Performance:
Universalistic and Contigency Perspectives, Fall pp 496-516
Gul, Fa, Tsui, J.S , Fong, S. C.C and Kwok, HYL, 1995. Desentralization as a Moderating Factor in the
Budgetary Participation-Performance Relationship: Some Hongkong Evidance, Accounting and
Business Research, Vol.25 no. 98 pp 107-113
Hair (Jr), J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham and B. Black 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall: New
York.
Hair, Joseph E., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronald L., Black, William C., 1995,“Multivariate Data
Analysisâ€, Prentice-Hall International Inc.
Hollenbeck, John R., Williams, Charles R., dan Klein, Howard J., 1989, “An Empirical Examination of the
Antecedents of Commitment to Difficult Goals’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 18-23
Indriantoro, Nur,. 1993. The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance and Job Satisfaction with
Lucos of Control and Cultural Dimension as Moderating Variables, University of Kentucky,
Disertation, Publication no.18.
Kanodia, Chandra, 1993, “Participative Budgets as Coordination and Motivational Devicesâ€, Journal of
Accounting Research, Autumn, 31 (2), hal. 172-189.
Kasiyanto, 2002. Pengaruh Partisipasi Pejabat Struktural dalam Penyusunan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja
Manajerail pada Pemda dengan Dimensi Desentralisasi Struktur Organisasi. Tesis S2, UGM
Kenis, I. 1979. Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitude and Performance,
Accounting Review Oct pp 707-721
Kenis, Izzettin, 1979, “Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitudes and Performanceâ€,
The Accounting Review, 14 (4), hal. 707-721
Ketchand, Alice A., dan Strawser, Jerry A., 2001, “Multiple Dimensions of Organizational Commitment:
Implications for Future Accounting Research, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, hal. 221-
Korsgaard M. Audrey, Schweiger, david M. dan Sapienza, Harry J., 1995, “Building Commitment,
Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justiceâ€,
Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), hal. 60-84
Kotter, JP & Heskett, JL, 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance, New York
Kren, L., dan W.M. Liao, 1992, “Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance: The Impact of
Information and Environment Volatility, The Accounting Review, hal. 511-526
Lau, Chong M., Low, Liang C., dan Eggleton, Ian R., 1995, “The Impact of Reliance on Accounting
Performance Measures on Job-Related Tension and Managerial Performance: Additional
Evidenceâ€, Accounting, Organization and Society, 20 (5), hal. 359-381
Locke, Edwin A., Shaw, Karyll N., Saari, Lise M., dan Latham, Gary P., 1981, “Goal Setting and Task
Performance: 1969-1980â€, Psychological Bulletin, 125-152
Mahoney, T.A, T.H. Jerdee dan S.J. Carroll, 1963, Development of Managerial Performance: A Research
Approach, Cincinnati, Ohio: South Western Publishing Co.
Merchant, K.A., 1981, “The Design of The Corporate Budgeting System: Influences on Managerial Behavior
and Performanceâ€, The Accounting Review, hal. 813-829
Milani, K, 1975. Relationship of Partisipan in Budget-Setting to Industrial Supervisor Performance and
Attitude: A field study, The Accounting Review, April, pp 274-284
Mulyasari,Windu, 2004. Pengaruh Keadilan Persepsian, Komitmen Pada Tujuan, Dan Job-Relevant
Information Terhadap Hubungan Antara Penganggaran Partisipatif Dan Kinerja Manajer, Tesis
S2, UGM.
Murray, D. 1988. The Performance Effects of Participative Budgeting: An Integration of Intervening and
Moderating Variables, Behavior Research in Accounting, Vol. 2 pp. 104-123.
Nadler, D.,&Tushman, M. (1999). The organization of the Future: Strategic Imperatives and Core
Competencies for the 21st Century. Organizational Dynamics, Vol.28, 45-60.
Nazaruddin, Ietje. 1998. Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen
terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia (JRAI), Vol. 1, No. 2, hal 141-162.
Nurata, I Wayan., 2006. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial: Budaya
Organisasi dan Motivasi sebagai moderating
Otley, David dan Pollanen, Raili M., 2000, “Budgetary Criteria in Performance Evaluation: A Critical
Appraisal Using New Evidence, Accounting, Organization and Society, 25, hal. 483-496
____________, 1978, “Budget Use and Managerial Performanceâ€, Journal Accounting Research, 16, hal.
-149.
